10 Best Open-Source Website Builders in 2025

Open-Source Website Builders

In 2025, building a website is no longer limited to expensive platforms or locked-down page builders. Thanks to the rise of open-source website builders, individuals, startups, and hybrid teams now have complete control over their web presence, without the bloated costs or restrictive ecosystems.

Whether you’re creating a personal portfolio, launching a community platform, or scaling an e-commerce site, Open-Source Website Builders offer unmatched flexibility, transparency, and security. These tools let you fully own your code, customize everything from the ground up, and benefit from thriving developer communities. Additionally, they’re ideal for remote teams that prioritize version control, privacy, and seamless cross-platform performance.

This guide explores the 10 best Open-Source Website Builders in 2025, each carefully chosen for its features, usability, scalability, and active community support. Let’s dive into the tools empowering modern creators to build faster and smarter.

Web Development Services
WordPress Emergency Support Plan

What Are Open-Source Website Builders?

Open-source website builders are platforms that allow users to create, manage, and customize websites using source code that is publicly accessible. Unlike proprietary builders, these tools give developers and tech-savvy users full control over the design, structure, and functionality of their sites. You can tweak core files, add third-party extensions, or even build your own features from scratch.

This level of flexibility is especially appealing to developers, small businesses, or teams that want freedom from platform lock-ins. Whether you’re building a blog, eCommerce store, or portfolio site, open-source website builders empower you to mold the site exactly how you want—without relying on restrictive templates or expensive premium plugins. Plus, most of these tools have strong community support and are free to use, making them both budget-friendly and future-proof.

How to Choose the Right Open-Source Website Builder

Choosing the right open-source website builder starts with knowing your technical comfort level and project needs. If you’re a beginner or solo creator, look for builders that offer drag-and-drop editors, active community forums, and plenty of free templates. These features will help you launch faster without writing complex code. On the other hand, if you’re a developer or running a team, you’ll want a builder with extensibility—one that supports custom themes, plugin development, and API integrations.

You should also consider factors like hosting flexibility, mobile responsiveness, SEO tools, and ongoing support. Some open-source builders work best when self-hosted, while others come with optional managed hosting services. The right platform should match your workflow today and scale with your website as it grows—without locking you into expensive upgrades or closed ecosystems.

The Best Open‑Source Website Builders

1. WordPress.org (Web, Mobile via apps)

Open-Source Website Builders

Best for: Blogs, small business sites, and anyone needing tons of plugins.

Pros:

  • Huge plugin/theme ecosystem
  • Massive community & documentation
  • Easy publishing with block editor

Cons:

  • Plugin conflicts can arise
  • Might need tweaks for performance

WordPress.org isn’t just open-source—it’s a full CMS. Its block‑based editor lets you build pages visually, while access to PHP and REST API means you can customize deeply. That said, quality plugins (like caching and security add-ons) are key for speed and safety. You can host it yourself or with managed providers, and core software is free.

Recommendation: Ideal for writers, solopreneurs, and DIY marketers.

2. Joomla! (Web, Android, iOS via apps)

Best for: Medium-to-large sites needing flexible content structures.

Pros:

  • Multilingual and multi-user support built-in
  • Advanced content types with custom fields

Cons:

  • Steeper learning curve than other options
  • Fewer extensions than WordPress

Joomla balances power and control—it scales from blogs to e-commerce and community sites without many add-ons. It also handles user roles well and supports front-end editing. Hosting is separate, and you choose templates and extensions from its library.

Recommendation: Great for content-heavy platform needs with multiple contributors.

3. Drupal (Web)

Best for: Complex sites or government-grade security.

Pros:

  • Extremely flexible data architecture
  • Strong access control and multilingual tools

Cons:

  • Technical and steep to deploy
  • Smaller module ecosystem

Drupal is known for powering sophisticated, secure sites. You can tailor every component and user permission, but development typically requires a developer. It’s ideal for large NGOs, universities, or enterprise portals. Free to use, with paid hosting and dev cost.

Recommendation: Best for teams that want full flexibility and security control.

4. Grav (Web)

Best for: Lightweight, file-based, and fast sites.

Pros:

  • Zero‑database performance
  • Easy to backup and deploy

Cons:

  • Not ideal for non-tech users
  • Slanguard extensions are fewer

Grav uses flat files—no database required. It’s fast and portable, perfect for simple sites, product documentation, or portfolios. Templating uses Twig, and it has a streamlined CLI system. Installing themes/plugins costs nothing beyond server hosting.

Recommendation: Ideal for tech‑savvy individuals who expect speed and simplicity.

5. OctoberCMS (Web)

Best for: Developers or teams wanting Laravel-based building.

Pros:

  • Built on Laravel for clean MVC coding
  • Handles multisite and custom data

Cons:

  • Requires Laravel knowledge
  • Add-ons quality varies

OctoberCMS gives developers full control via Laravel’s backend. The page builder is intuitive, and data models are manageable. It’s project-grade—ideal for agencies delivering Laravel-based client sites. Core is free; premium add-ons extend features.

Recommendation: Perfect for Laravel devs building custom web apps or business platforms.

6. Hugo (Web, Desktop CLI)

Open-Source Website Builders

Best for: Developer‑led static sites and blogs.

Pros:

  • Extremely fast builds
  • Markdown-based and Git-driven

Cons:

  • No dynamic CMS features
  • Requires familiarity with Git

Hugo converts markdown into lightning-fast static pages. Ideal for blogs, documentation, or brochure sites with CDN hosting. It has great theming and built-in taxonomies—no database, no backend. Hosting via Netlify or GitHub Pages is free or affordable.

Recommendation: Great for content-first tech teams focused on speed and low maintenance.

7. Ghost (Web, iOS, Android via apps)

Best for: Modern blogging and membership sites.

Pros:

  • Built‑in membership and subscription support
  • Sleek block editor

Cons:

  • Less flexible for non-blog use
  • Hosting isn’t free

Ghost reinvents blogging with membership tiers, email newsletters, and performance features. Its Markdown editor and theme system make it easy and elegant. Core is open-source, but Ghost(Pro) hosting starts at $11/month.

Recommendation: Best for solo writers and digital publishers building paid audiences.

8. Strapi (Web)

Best for: Headless CMS projects powering modern front‑ends.

Pros:

  • Full REST/GraphQL API out-of-the-box
  • User roles and media library

Cons:

  • No default front-end; requires development
  • Self-hosting costs apply

Strapi provides content structure and APIs, ready to pair with JAMstack front-ends (React, Vue, Angular). It’s perfect for decoupled architectures or mobile apps. You choose hosting (Heroku, AWS, DigitalOcean) and customize via plugins.

Recommendation: Ideal for developers building headless websites and apps.

9. WalletCMS (Web)

Best for: Lightweight CMS with strong theming and module support.

Pros:

  • Easy installation and module marketplace
  • Multipurpose from blogs to shops

Cons:

  • Limited advanced customization
  • Smaller community

WalletCMS offers a user-friendly experience with pre-built themes and modules like events, blogs, galleries, and stores. While less code-heavy, it still lets users customize templates via Twig. Hosting cost is all you pay.

Recommendation: Suited for small teams building sites quickly with minimal dev resources.

10. React Static / Gatsby (Web)

Open-Source Website Builders

Best for: JavaScript and React developers building blazing-fast websites.

Pros:

  • React-based developer experience
  • Plugins to source Markdown or CMS content

Cons:

  • Setup requires Node.js / Git knowledge
  • Build times can grow on large sites

Gatsby and its modern React Static variant help build static, SEO-friendly, and performant websites. Both pull content from headless APIs (Markdown, CMS, APIs), then build at deploy time. Hosting via Netlify/Vercel is easy and often free.

Recommendation: Best for dev-heavy teams focused on performance and modern front-end stacks.

BuddyX Theme

Final Thoughts

Open-source website builders offer unmatched freedom, flexibility, and customization for anyone building a modern website in 2025. Whether you’re a blogger who wants full control over your site’s design or a development team crafting scalable digital experiences, these tools empower you to build without being locked into proprietary systems or high-cost subscriptions.

Each option on this list shines in different scenarios—some are ideal for beginners who want simplicity, while others offer developer-friendly frameworks for custom web apps. The key is to align the tool’s strengths with your goals, technical skills, and long-term needs. With the right open-source website builder, you get more than just a site—you gain ownership of your online presence and the power to grow it your way.

Interesting Reads:

10 Best AI Tools for Content Creation in 2025

CMS vs Website Builders | Easy Way To Create A Website

10 Best Software for Source Code Management in 2025

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest

Newsletter

Get tips, product updates, and discounts straight to your inbox.

This field is hidden when viewing the form

Name
Privacy(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.